Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Parental Rights
- Fellow Editors
- 7 hours ago
- 2 min read
Upholds the Right of Parents to Opt their Children OUT of Lessons that Violate Religious Beliefs 6-3
Maryland parents advocate for religious rights outside the U.S. Supreme Court on April 22, 2025, Photo Credit: Yahoo.com
The Supreme Court ruled on Friday, June 27, 2025 on the Mahmoud v. Taylor case in a 6-3 majority which stated that parents must be allowed to opt their children out of reading or being taught material that conflicts with their religious or moral beliefs.
The case originated in Montgomery County, Maryland when a group of parents objected to their children being taught from a reading list that promoted same sex households, LGBTQ history, or gender fluidity in classrooms as young as kindergarten. The parents were never notified or given notice that their children were being exposed to these materials and were NOT given the option to "opt out" for their children.
Montgomery County had allowed parental opt outs until they said the process was too complicated and took the opt out away. In their opinion too many parents had chosen to opt their children out of using the materials. They did this instead of simply removing materials that were clearly so objectionable to parents. The Montgomery County school board claimed it had no "obligation" to notify parents of provide alternatives.
While the arguments were presented to the Supreme Court, liberal judge Ketanji Brown stated that if parents didn't like what was being taught, they could move their children to private schools. It was considered a controversial, elitist comment from the judge.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the conservative majority, said:
"The Constitution protects a parent's right to raise their children according to their deeply held beliefs. Public education must not become a tool to override those rights under the guise of inclusion."
The ruling does not ban LGBTQ materials; it just states that the state cannot force them on children.
The ruling means that opt out policies will become mandatory, parents will have transparency in seeing what their children are being taught, and educators will have new limits to their promotion of ideological content. This could include critical race theory, sex education, etc.
Details about the case are below:
Other Information on SCOTUS cases:
Jan Greenhawk, Author
June 26, 2025
Jan Greenhawk is a former teacher and school administrator for over thirty years. She has two grown children and lives with her husband in Maryland. She also spent over twenty-five years coaching/judging gymnastics and coaching women’s softball.
This article was originally featured on the Easton Gazette.
Please consider joining the Delmarva Parent Teacher Coalition and follow us on FaceBook to stay informed of what's really happening with education in our schools. Copyright DelmarvaPTC.org
Comments